User Tools

Site Tools


2009:map_standards_-_who_needs_them_anyway

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

2009:map_standards_-_who_needs_them_anyway [2009/10/07 04:20]
geografa
2009:map_standards_-_who_needs_them_anyway [2009/10/07 04:34] (current)
geografa
Line 1: Line 1:
-In looking at a variety of printed maps, it's obvious that both professionals and armchair cartographers are capable of creating ​maps suitable for these orienteering events. {{:​2009:​orienteering1.jpg|}}+In looking at a variety of printed maps, we discussed the interesting adherence to the standards as well as the subtleties in the styles. It's obvious that both professionals and armchair cartographers are capable of creating ​works of art
  
-However, it was also noted that subtleties ​in each map have obvious styles ​and lead to influence and interpretation. ​+{{:​2009:​orienteering1.jpg|}} 
 + 
 +However, it was also noted that for all of the subtleties ​within ​each map, there are obvious styles ​that lead to influence and interpretation.
  
 {{:​2009:​mapsymbols_2000.jpg|}} {{:​2009:​mapsymbols_2000.jpg|}}
Line 7: Line 9:
 {{:​2009:​dutchman-2009.png|}} {{:​2009:​dutchman-2009.png|}}
  
-My breakthrough "a-ha moment",​ however, was in realizing that these are really just memes and not standards. They may make "​sense"​ but the efficacy of a standard is really localized (for agencies, departments,​ or even audiences). What drives it is still a mystery. Someone joked that the greatest thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. The question is why we choose one over another. Perhaps next year's session should be Memes in Cartography. Other thoughts?+This stemmed off into discussion regarding AutoCAD standards and some GIS mapping standards. Tim Welch shared [[http://​cloudmade.com|Cloudmade'​s]] Mapnik engine that has driven the development of many styles within the [[http://​openstreetmap.org|Openstreet Map]] community. ​My own breakthrough "a-ha moment",​ however, was in realizing that these are really just memes and not standards. They may make "​sense"​ but the efficacy of a standard is really localized (for agencies, departments,​ or even audiences). What drives it is still a mystery. Someone joked that the greatest thing about standards is that there are so many to choose from. The question is why we choose one over another. Perhaps next year's session should be Memes in Cartography. Other thoughts?
2009/map_standards_-_who_needs_them_anyway.txt · Last modified: 2009/10/07 04:34 by geografa